D 2026

Legal Protection Against Deepfakes: Preventive and Punitive Tools and Their Effectiveness

PAČMAG, Marek a Zdeněk FIALA

Základní údaje

Originální název

Legal Protection Against Deepfakes: Preventive and Punitive Tools and Their Effectiveness

Autoři

PAČMAG, Marek a Zdeněk FIALA

Vydání

1. vyd. Bucharest, Paris, and Calgary, Artificial Intelligence, Cyberspace and Digital Transformation: Legal Challenges for Innovation, Security and Human Rights, od s. 183-200, 19 s. 2026

Nakladatel

ADJURIS – International Academic Publisher

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Stať ve sborníku

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Rumunsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

elektronická verze "online"

Odkazy

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

CEVRO Univerzita

ISBN

978-630-6743-08-7

Klíčová slova anglicky

AI act; DSA; GDPR; transparency; criminal law; sanctions

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 9. 10. 2026 10:18, doc. JUDr. Zdeněk Fiala, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

The aim of this paper is to analyze the system of legal remedies against the illegal dissemination of deepfakes, evaluate their effectiveness, and discuss current issues related to establishing criminal liability. To this end, the article is divided into three main parts. The introductory part is dedicated to a general presentation of deepfakes, the second deals with preventive legal instruments, and the third focuses on punitive instruments. In analyzing the legislation, the authors focus particularly on the following research questions, which reflect the objectives of the text: (1) which regulations apply to deepfakes and in what manner, (2) whether the legal instruments defined therein can prevent or limit the misuse of deepfakes, and (3) identifying obstacles to their application. To answer these questions, methods of doctrinal research are primarily used in combination with a socio-legal approach. The conclusion is that the obligation to label deepfakes introduced by European regulations is not, in itself, capable of eliminating the risks associated with the illegal dissemination of deepfakes; however, it is able to at least partially mitigate (reduce) them. Preventive measures must therefore be followed by punitive instruments, whether in the field of civil or criminal law protection. At the level of substantive criminal law, the situation is assessed as satisfactory and responsive to changes. The main problem in prosecuting deepfakes and their illegal use/dissemination lies in procedural aspects, particularly in evidence and the assessment of their recognizability, which, after all, is also a problem in relation to prevention