2025
Assessment of the level of disadvantage in people aged 65+
NEUGEBAUER, Jan and Žaneta NĚMCOVÁBasic information
Original name
Assessment of the level of disadvantage in people aged 65+
Name (in English)
Assessment of the level of disadvantage in people aged 65+
Authors
NEUGEBAUER, Jan and Žaneta NĚMCOVÁ
Edition
Praktický lékař, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Medical Association J.E. Purkyne, 2025, 0032-6739
Other information
Language
Czech
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
30227 Geriatrics and gerontology
Country of publisher
Czech Republic
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Marked to be transferred to RIV
Yes
Organization unit
CEVRO University
EID Scopus
Keywords in English
disadvantage; geriatrics; population 65+; WHODAS 2.0
Tags
Reviewed
Changed: 25/3/2026 13:29, Mgr. Jan Neugebauer, Ph.D., MBA
In the original language
The age of 65 is a current milestone in the social sphere in the Czech Republic and indicates the possibility of retirement. This is also associated with health and social consequences, cultural restrictions, social isolation, the development of geriatric syndrome, and polymorbidity. Our study focuses on assessing the degree of disadvantage in people aged 65 and over using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 tool. A total of 1128 questionnaires were analyzed, indicating significant limitations in all areas examined-understanding and communication, mobility, self-care, establishing relationships with other people, household care, and participation in society. According to previous studies, we also monitored the value of overall disadvantage in the area of involvement in society. We found that this value exceeds the disadvantage value in the area of mobility, and the overall level surpasses that of a third of the sample. The study emphasizes the need for support for geriatric patients. The current system is in line with this discourse and is therefore still very relevant and suitable for further exploration.
In English
The age of 65 is a current milestone in the social sphere in the Czech Republic and indicates the possibility of retirement. This is also associated with health and social consequences, cultural restrictions, social isolation, the development of geriatric syndrome, and polymorbidity. Our study focuses on assessing the degree of disadvantage in people aged 65 and over using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 tool. A total of 1128 questionnaires were analyzed, indicating significant limitations in all areas examined-understanding and communication, mobility, self-care, establishing relationships with other people, household care, and participation in society. According to previous studies, we also monitored the value of overall disadvantage in the area of involvement in society. We found that this value exceeds the disadvantage value in the area of mobility, and the overall level surpasses that of a third of the sample. The study emphasizes the need for support for geriatric patients. The current system is in line with this discourse and is therefore still very relevant and suitable for further exploration.