2025
Assessment of the level of disadvantage in people aged 65+
NEUGEBAUER, Jan a Žaneta NĚMCOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Assessment of the level of disadvantage in people aged 65+
Název anglicky
Assessment of the level of disadvantage in people aged 65+
Autoři
NEUGEBAUER, Jan a Žaneta NĚMCOVÁ
Vydání
Praktický lékař, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Medical Association J.E. Purkyne, 2025, 0032-6739
Další údaje
Jazyk
čeština
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30227 Geriatrics and gerontology
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Organizační jednotka
CEVRO Univerzita
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
disadvantage; geriatrics; population 65+; WHODAS 2.0
Příznaky
Recenzováno
Změněno: 25. 3. 2026 13:29, Mgr. Jan Neugebauer, Ph.D., MBA
V originále
The age of 65 is a current milestone in the social sphere in the Czech Republic and indicates the possibility of retirement. This is also associated with health and social consequences, cultural restrictions, social isolation, the development of geriatric syndrome, and polymorbidity. Our study focuses on assessing the degree of disadvantage in people aged 65 and over using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 tool. A total of 1128 questionnaires were analyzed, indicating significant limitations in all areas examined-understanding and communication, mobility, self-care, establishing relationships with other people, household care, and participation in society. According to previous studies, we also monitored the value of overall disadvantage in the area of involvement in society. We found that this value exceeds the disadvantage value in the area of mobility, and the overall level surpasses that of a third of the sample. The study emphasizes the need for support for geriatric patients. The current system is in line with this discourse and is therefore still very relevant and suitable for further exploration.
Anglicky
The age of 65 is a current milestone in the social sphere in the Czech Republic and indicates the possibility of retirement. This is also associated with health and social consequences, cultural restrictions, social isolation, the development of geriatric syndrome, and polymorbidity. Our study focuses on assessing the degree of disadvantage in people aged 65 and over using the standardized WHODAS 2.0 tool. A total of 1128 questionnaires were analyzed, indicating significant limitations in all areas examined-understanding and communication, mobility, self-care, establishing relationships with other people, household care, and participation in society. According to previous studies, we also monitored the value of overall disadvantage in the area of involvement in society. We found that this value exceeds the disadvantage value in the area of mobility, and the overall level surpasses that of a third of the sample. The study emphasizes the need for support for geriatric patients. The current system is in line with this discourse and is therefore still very relevant and suitable for further exploration.