2025
Assessment the effectiveness of central crisis management at Charles University during the 2023 active shooter incident: a thematic analysis
KALVACH, Zdeněk, Otomar SLÁMA, Martin HRINKO and Martin HROMADABasic information
Original name
Assessment the effectiveness of central crisis management at Charles University during the 2023 active shooter incident: a thematic analysis
Authors
KALVACH, Zdeněk (203 Czech Republic, guarantor), Otomar SLÁMA (203 Czech Republic), Martin HRINKO (203 Czech Republic, belonging to the institution) and Martin HROMADA (203 Czech Republic)
Edition
Security Journal, 2025, 0955-1662
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Article in a journal
Field of Study
50500 5.5 Law
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
References:
Impact factor
Impact factor: 1.200 in 2022
Organization unit
CEVRO University
Keywords in English
Crisis management · Soft targets · Active shooter · Post-crisis recovery · Crisis response framework
Changed: 7/6/2025 17:13, doc. Ing. Martin Hrinko, Ph.D., MBA, LL.M.
Abstract
V originále
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the Central Crisis Management Team’s response at Charles University during the active shooter incident on December 21, 2023. Utilizing a qualitative and comparative methodological approach, this research systematically examines official records, meeting minutes, and interviews with key stakeholders to assess the effectiveness of crisis management practices. Thematic analysis was employed to identify and categorize the crisis management strategies into phases as outlined by the Czech Ministry of the Interior’s guidelines for handling soft target incidents (Ministry of the Interior, 2016). The findings reveal significant alignment with prescribed protocols during the initial response phase and identify an opportunity to expand the protocols to encompass additional thematic areas as the situation progressed. Building on these findings, the study concludes with actionable recommendations aimed at improving communication systems, integrating psychological support, and enhancing crisis preparedness at educational institutions. These recommendations, detailed in the Conclusion, offer a framework for strengthening security protocols and response strategies in academic settings.